![]() Supreme Court, which paused the lower court’s order via its shadow docket. Instead of following the court order, the state of Alabama accelerated the case to the U.S. In January 2022, a lower court determined that the map likely violated Section 2 of the VRA and ordered the Legislature to redraw a VRA-compliant map, specifically one that has a second majority-Black district. (There were also 14th Amendment racial gerrymandering claims at play, but these were not ruled on and remain a distinct concept from a Section 2 racial vote dilution claim.) Merrill, argued that the map violates Section 2 of the VRA by diluting the voting power of Black voters. The parties in Milligan, which was consolidated with another lawsuit Caster v. After the new map was adopted in November 2021, three sets of plaintiffs sued - all alleging racial discrimination but with different arguments. Following the release of 2020 census data, the Alabama Legislature redrew the state’s seven congressional districts, maintaining a single majority-Black district. Now, a case out of Alabama is putting Section 2 to the test. The most litigated section of the VRA, Section 2, protects against any voting law or district map that results in the “denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color.” In practice, this provision has been an important tool to fight against laws that were enacted with a discriminatory purpose or have a discriminatory impact. Milligan, a case that could fundamentally alter the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA). 4, the second day of its 2022 term, the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |